Comments on: Ajax, Hobo Style http://hobocentral.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/ Hobo - the web app builder for Rails Mon, 02 Jan 2012 20:47:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: victor http://hobocentral.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/comment-page-1/#comment-36238 victor Sat, 31 May 2008 14:19:16 +0000 http://hobotek.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/#comment-36238 <p>Tom - I don't understand most of the stuff in hobo-rapid.js. If I can , I will let you know.</p> Tom – I don’t understand most of the stuff in hobo-rapid.js. If I can , I will let you know.

]]> By: Tom http://hobocentral.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/comment-page-1/#comment-36138 Tom Fri, 30 May 2008 14:38:01 +0000 http://hobotek.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/#comment-36138 <p>Victor -- I really have no idea when this might happen. There are so many other priorities that it might not happen for a good while, or even at all. Why don't you have a go at moving hobo-rapid.js in that direction yourself?</p> Victor — I really have no idea when this might happen. There are so many other priorities that it might not happen for a good while, or even at all. Why don’t you have a go at moving hobo-rapid.js in that direction yourself?

]]> By: victor http://hobocentral.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/comment-page-1/#comment-36136 victor Fri, 30 May 2008 14:18:22 +0000 http://hobotek.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/#comment-36136 <p>Tom - thanks for responding. How soon will you move? It seems all js stuff are in one file hobo_rapid.js? It will be good for a lot of people since jQuery are getting so popular.</p> Tom – thanks for responding. How soon will you move? It seems all js stuff are in one file hobo_rapid.js? It will be good for a lot of people since jQuery are getting so popular.

]]> By: Tom http://hobocentral.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/comment-page-1/#comment-36068 Tom Thu, 29 May 2008 22:45:53 +0000 http://hobotek.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/#comment-36068 <p>Victor -- not really, not an easy way. But we're thinking of moving to jQuery anyway.</p> Victor — not really, not an easy way. But we’re thinking of moving to jQuery anyway.

]]> By: victor http://hobocentral.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/comment-page-1/#comment-36029 victor Thu, 29 May 2008 16:35:02 +0000 http://hobotek.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/#comment-36029 <p>Is there a way to use hobo and jQuery and remove all references to all prototype/script.aculo.us stuff? Thanks in advance.</p> Is there a way to use hobo and jQuery and remove all references to all prototype/script.aculo.us stuff? Thanks in advance.

]]> By: Brandon http://hobocentral.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/comment-page-1/#comment-30344 Brandon Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:08:13 +0000 http://hobotek.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/#comment-30344 <p>@Chihyung: actually jQuery is designed to make it easy to use alongside prototype and scriptaculous. There's info on their site about how to do this.</p> @Chihyung: actually jQuery is designed to make it easy to use alongside prototype and scriptaculous. There’s info on their site about how to do this.

]]> By: Chihyung Song http://hobocentral.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/comment-page-1/#comment-25167 Chihyung Song Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:47:30 +0000 http://hobotek.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/#comment-25167 <p>Can I you jQuery with Hobo? I'm using jRails so basic rails ajax helpers are works well.</p> <p>But If Hobo is using prototype and script.aculo.us internally, I can't(?) use jQuery(or must use jQuery with prototype together).</p> Can I you jQuery with Hobo?
I’m using jRails so basic rails ajax helpers are works well.

But If Hobo is using prototype and script.aculo.us internally, I can’t(?) use jQuery(or must use jQuery with prototype together).

]]> By: Brandon http://hobocentral.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/comment-page-1/#comment-22854 Brandon Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:41:54 +0000 http://hobotek.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/#comment-22854 <p>Tom: I wholeheartedly agree with you about making the dryml look like HTML. It <em>might</em> make sense to use <namespace:tagname> if lots of us share tags and we want to avoid name collisions, but this is not going to be a problem between the base DRYML tags and HTML. And I would assume that any developer worth their salt knows all the HTML tags and won't have any trouble at all know which ones are therefore DRYML.</p> <p>I <em>suppose</em> if enough people wanted it, it probably wouldn't be hard for you to add the ability to use a verbose syntax, such as <dry:page>, but I for one would never use it.</p> Tom: I wholeheartedly agree with you about making the dryml look like HTML. It might make sense to use <namespace:tagname> if lots of us share tags and we want to avoid name collisions, but this is not going to be a problem between the base DRYML tags and HTML. And I would assume that any developer worth their salt knows all the HTML tags and won’t have any trouble at all know which ones are therefore DRYML.

I suppose if enough people wanted it, it probably wouldn’t be hard for you to add the ability to use a verbose syntax, such as <dry:page>, but I for one would never use it.

]]> By: Joseph http://hobocentral.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/comment-page-1/#comment-21222 Joseph Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:33:40 +0000 http://hobotek.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/#comment-21222 <p>Is there a reason i am getting invalid tag on hobo<em>rapid</em>javascripts?</p> Is there a reason i am getting invalid tag on hoborapidjavascripts?

]]> By: Extefearady http://hobocentral.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/comment-page-1/#comment-20422 Extefearady Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:59:00 +0000 http://hobotek.net/blog/2006/12/05/ajax-hobo-style/#comment-20422 <p>You hit a sore point. Extrefox</p> You hit a sore point.
Extrefox

]]>